Search

 

  BU Boxer 

Editor’s note: This was posted to the Judges-L e-mail list. It is reprinted here with permission.

Letter to the CA Assembly

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I would like to present my views on this pending legislation. You are being led astray by animal rights activists who consider that animals have the same rights as humans. They feel it is cruel to put a saddle on a horse; that milk is liquid meat; that there should be zero pet population; that we do not "own" animals--we are simply their guardians. They have burned down facilities and let lab animals run free to be killed or eaten; they have poisoned animals at Fairs and Dog Shows feeling they would be better off dead than in "bondage" to us humans. Does all of this present rational thinking?

I don't know how many of you do have pets in your household, but I cannot imagine life without some animals with which to share it. My dogs live in the house with me; I use them to provide therapy to older people and Alzheimer’s patients; we work in hospitals; we participate in the READ program where children read to animals. My dogs choose to walk at my side.

Their idea of freedom is to share my life. My dogs ride in the car, stay at motels, chase balls, ride elevators, and get to experience all aspects of life. They do not have any idea of running free to get hit by cars or killed and eaten by becoming part of the animal food chain. The domestic dog became that way when he chose to walk into the cave to live with man and help him with the needs of daily living, i.e. hunters, herders, retrievers, guarders, etc.

This background leads us to the present nationwide endeavor of these activists to eliminate what they perceive of as inhumane treatment. They know they can appeal to your unenlightened sense of what is cruelty. I worked for a Veterinarian who did many ear crops on breeds that are commonly cropped. I saw those puppies before and after surgery and I will attest to the fact that they led a far more loving life than all those mutts tied to a tree or dog house in someone's back yard and allowed to reproduce uncontrolled. They loved to come to the Vet. They got structure, attention, biscuits, training, care, played with, and all around interest from their owners and the staff. This, contrasted with the animals that never get out of the back yard for a car ride, sleep at the foot of the bed, go for a walk in the park, play ball or get any human interaction.

Those puppies did not suffer any more than a dog undergoing neutering surgery.

As for docking tails--I have two docked breeds. I tie off their tails in the same way that cattlemen, goat and sheep herders, nature centers, zoos, etc., dock or castrate. I worked as a back office nurse in a pediatrics practice and watched many a circumcision--my puppies hardly notice their procedure, but I can assure you those baby boys did notice! If dewclaws are not removed at the same time they get ripped off in the field or in play. That repair does require anesthesia, sutures, and bandages!

You could argue that, especially in California, plastic surgery is elective yet chosen by millions of people who do suffer greatly in order to enhance their appearance. Although the dogs do not have a choice, there is no comparison with the amount of discomfort. The dogs hardly notice what is happening to them.

This is just one more ploy to bring legislation that will, in the long run, help eliminate the pet population. Remember--their ultimate goal is ZERO PET POPULATION. The whole guardianship issue came about because they could see that all pets could be legally seized by the government because they were no longer "owned"!!!!!!!!

I implore you to consider your vote in this matter. A vote against this legislation is a vote for the animals, and for responsible pet ownership.

These activists have become very clever at fooling you and appealing to an unenlightened public. Thank you so much for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Nancy Shaffer Smith, Red Lodge, Montana

This letter was sent to:

Assemblymember.Lasuer@assembly.ca.gov

Assemblymember.dymally@assembly.ca.gov

Assemblymember.Cohn@assembly.ca.gov

Assemblymember.Goldberg@assembly.ca.gov

Assemblymember.spitzer@assembly.ca.gov

 


 

 

 

HEALTH TESTED BOXERS | SEARCH | Index of Past Articles | Reader's Comments |
Links | Copyright | COMMENTS

Last Revised: 08/26/06

Editor: Virginia Zurflieh  |  Contact Us: Webmaster     Editor