Search

 

  BU Boxer 

THE BU EDITORIAL

Virginia Zurflieh, editor
Vzboxers@aol.com

AR Activists Acting Badly: CA AB418

This didn’t start out to be the "Opposition-to-Animal-Rights" issue of the BU, but it seems to have ended up that way, thanks to a recent stir on the boxer e-mail lists caused by an anti-cropping bill sponsored in the California Assembly by the Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights (AVAR), and supported by PETA and HSUS, among other radical AR organizations.

Despite that the issue of cropping resides in a very gray area, and the general non-show public appears to be widely opposed to our desire to continue the practice, I still believe that we dog fanciers must band together to fight the AR people with everything we’ve got, on ANY issue that affects pet ownership. Because IMO, these never-ending battles are not about cropping, docking, breed-specific legislation, or pet overpopulation. This war is over whether or not we own our dogs – whether our dogs and cats and gerbils are our property…or our peers. And the AR activists have taken on the dog fancy, not because dog breeders as a group are more "cruel" than the meat and poultry industries...but because we're an easier target!! 

Think about it: almost everybody owns and loves a pet and can be convinced with a few photos of freshly cropped puppies that the cropping aspect of animal ownership is inhumane. Almost everybody can be convinced with a few photos of sad-faced puppies and kittens peering out between the bars of their cage in the local animal control facility that purebred dog and cat breeders are denying those wretched creatures a loving, permanent home.

Most people eat meat, too, but almost nobody wants to think about how their Big Mac got into that little styrofoam box at MacDonald's. Or what went into their Bacon-Doublecheeseburger.

In other words, those in the dog fancy who don't fight the AR Agenda on this occasion because they don't disagree with (or are ambivalent about) a cropping ban, will be tied in local and national legislative knots by the time the AR folks get around to taking on an animal ownership issue that they DO strongly oppose!

I feel so strongly about this issue, that I'm going to close with a (rough) quote from WW II that I think is applicable here:

"When they came for the Trade Unionists, I didn't protest; when they came for the Jews, I didn't protest; when they came for the Gypsies, I didn't protest; when they came for me, there was no-one left to protest."

Outrageous hyperbole when we’re talking about dogs? Maybe. But remember that Ingrid Newkirk, the president of PETA, once likened the deaths of millions of broiler chickens in slaughter houses to the Holocaust (see "The Big Picture" in this issue)! The AR zealots routinely think in those terms, and so far, they've had a great deal of success across the Atlantic on animal issues that go WAY beyond cropping and docking.

Another Letter to California Assembly.

 


 

 

 

HEALTH TESTED BOXERS | SEARCH | Index of Past Articles | Reader's Comments |
Links | Copyright | COMMENTS

Last Revised: 08/26/06

Editor: Virginia Zurflieh  |  Contact Us: Webmaster     Editor