An Open Letter to American Boxer Breeders

from Dr. Bruce Cattanach
Hi All,
Following up on my last message I am hoping that some of you may be able
to help me with Holter analysis as might be applied to UK Boxers.
I have been reading of all your concerns about Holter testing and the
problems of recognizing 'normal' dogs. You have no idea how much I
sympathize with your predicament and, given that we all face the same
problems, I wonder if we jointly could find some sense in all this.
As a start, what is really known? Someone mentioned Beagles being
tested as normal dogs. Have these results ever been published or
presented anywhere? But it is really longitudinal studies I am after –
the year by year results for individual dogs, ideally over a lifetime,
with or without CM developing. Have any such results been
published? I am aware that BU is publishing results proffered by
individual boxer owners, and these alone are quite useful. I would
expect that Kate Meurs and others must have some data but all this must
be a drop in the ocean relative to the amount of annual Holter testing
which would seem to be a big part of Boxer breeding in the States.
What I am suggesting is that for those interested I would be willing to
collate results, in confidence, such that I could offer them back to you
in a way that might help answer your questions on Holter results and
also help me formulate ideas for dealing with CM here in the UK as
geneticist to a newly-formed Boxer health committee.
I would not even need dogs' names, although there must be some way of
identifying animals to update results. However, the more
information supplied, the more answers might be obtained. The
basic information for a preliminary study would therefore be
identification/name, date of birth, date/age at testing (it does not
have to be every single year), numbers of VPCs, doubles, triples, runs
(whatever supplied) for as many years as possible, to death if possible
and, in which case, cause of death. The other information would
also help interpretation could include that on relatives/progeny who
have developed the disease. I would stress that one is looking for
information on potentially 'normal' animals as well as those with
'risky' and bad Holter scores.
How many of you keep such records and would make them available for
collation/analysis in confidence? How many of you are currently
collecting such information and would supply this in future as it
accumulates?
I well recognize the problems of such an investigation, such as the
wobbles of Holter scoring and the existence of other factors that cause
VPCs, but in groups of dogs these problems may be ironed to out to give
us a picture of what is generally happening and what levels of increase
in VPCs occur in normals as well as affecteds.
Bruce Cattanach
Email: bcattanach@steynmere.freeserve.co.uk |
| |
|